Author Topic: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010  (Read 570995 times)

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • the pinnacle of human emotion
    • View Profile
    • DigitalMZX
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1185 on: November 16, 2010, 01:13:50 AM »
Huh, curious how other people would solve this

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html?hp

I had something like 29%/71%

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1186 on: November 16, 2010, 11:51:24 AM »
I had 42%/58%, but I didn't spend nearly as much time as I probably should have, lol.

The problem with stuff like that is that it completely masks the true difficulty of those decisions. Nobody knows for sure how much you would save by enacting many of those measures. Plus, there are always unintended side effects to those things that people need to try to figure out a and plan for.
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Sneaky

  • Windows 8 Knowledge Base
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1297
  • Where I come from they call it the Hibbity Dibbity
    • View Profile
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1187 on: November 16, 2010, 05:53:12 PM »
I did 35%/65% :p fuckin banks
I wish that cake was a lie. :(

I guess he never figured out what Willis was saying :/

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1188 on: November 16, 2010, 07:03:30 PM »
Lol, yeah, that, and estate taxes. Those were one of my big things. I mean, if you can manage to be worth millions of dollars, I think there is a bit of extra tax due... I'm all for a free economy, but the people making absurd amounts of money deserve to give a fair bit back.
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Kulli

  • Guest
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1189 on: November 16, 2010, 08:37:24 PM »
Lol, yeah, that, and estate taxes. Those were one of my big things. I mean, if you can manage to be worth millions of dollars, I think there is a bit of extra tax due... I'm all for a free economy, but the people making absurd amounts of money deserve to give a fair bit back.

Must be nice to live outside of the US. Many (dare I say "most"?) Americans will argue that people making millions of dollars a year do not deserve to pay any more than they do now...even when they themselves are under the poverty line.

And people wonder why I dislike this country

MortifiedocAlot

  • I GOT GULD STERRRRZZ
  • Hero Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4760
  • ಠ_ಠ
    • View Profile
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1190 on: November 16, 2010, 09:58:34 PM »
I've never understood how slightly taxing the rich more isn't a good idea. Every argument against it is just bullshit. "BAWW PEOPLE WON'T WANT TO WORK MORE BECAUSE THEY'LL GET TAXED MORE" is the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

I did 35%/65% :p fuckin banks

HOW DO THEY WORK?


Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1191 on: November 17, 2010, 01:12:07 AM »
Must be nice to live outside of the US. Many (dare I say "most"?) Americans will argue that people making millions of dollars a year do not deserve to pay any more than they do now...even when they themselves are under the poverty line.

And people wonder why I dislike this country

Fucking teabaggers. Those guys should be in an insane aslyum. (And yeah, I do follow american politics a bit. Seeing as you guys are our big neighbour, it does tend to make some difference here.) I like to see myself as a North American first, and a Canadian second. Sometimes I truly wish I could vote in the American elections as well.

To be fair, I'd much rather live in the US than Russia, or China, or a good portion of the world, for that matter. I just think that maybe some of the socialist ideas (NOT communist, and not what people are calling socialist, but the REAL socialist ideals) are good. I think that there should be a much smaller distance between how much the rich earn, and how much the poor earn. I mean, even here in Canada, the politics are retarded.

<rant topic="Politics" length="not long enough">

And Canada has it's share of retarded political shit too. I'd love to see our NDP party get some real power, but like hell that's happening any time soon. Every time the conservatives fuck up, people vote liberal, and when the liberals fuck up, they vote conservative. Nobody ever seems to realize that the NDP would probably fix most of the crap people are complaining about. We're practically a fucking 2 party system, thanks to how retarded Canadians seem to be.

It bothers me that even here in a place that is known for being socialist, it seems like idealism takes a back seat to the ridiculous posturing, and preening that is politics. And what's worse, we don't even vote "for" our ideals, we always seem to be voting "against" whoever fucked up last. One year the liberals are caught misusing money, so the conservatives end up in power, and then a couple years later, they get caught, so the liberals are back in power. And what's worse, our conservatives are far more conservative now than they were a generation ago, thanks to the crazy reform party taking over. It's like if the teabaggers took over the republican party :/ But we have an alternative (well, a couple, but the only one that matters is the NDP). A lot of my friends, and even my brother voted for them (I voted liberal because I knew damn well that one election wasn't gonna suddenly see the NDP winning enough seats to be in power, and I'd much rather get Harper and his cronies out of power) but it seems that outside of the young generation, the NDP isn't getting nearly enough votes to matter. It's sad, when so many people want change, and refuse to vote for the one party that would actually bring some change...

</rant>

Yeah, I could write a pretty large essay on this shit. We still have our fair share of retarded people. We might be more liberal than the states, but there are still crazy bastards like the teabaggers here (the conservative party is now full of them).
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Kulli

  • Guest
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1192 on: November 17, 2010, 01:43:53 AM »
The stuff on American politics I will not comment on, because nothing else needs to be said

I actually read cbc.ca every day. I enjoy seeing how much more...intelligent and overall less "angry" the commenters are. From what I understand, the Conservatives are half-retarded and blame everyone else for everything, the Liberals go "uhhhhhhhhhh" when asked for comment about anything/something that could give them a lead in the polls comes up, and the NDP is like that kid that's half your age that's only there to be the butt of jokes.

I actually find Canadian politics interesting, despite my strong disdain for American politics. And despite my dislike for the US, I would rather live here than Russia or China, too, but for a couple of extra reasons (I don't remember Japanese people being well-received in China or Russia :P)

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1193 on: November 17, 2010, 01:59:31 AM »
lol, you've got it pretty close there. The NDP are a little more socialist than the liberals (Basically, more left wing in general) but they also seem to have the least retarded posturing and shit. Basically, if they say they want to do something, they're gonna try to do it, and do it right, unlike both the liberals and the conservatives (neither of whom ever seem to deliver on half their promises, like most politicians).

There's one thing I really wish that we'd take from american politics. You guys get to vote for a particular candidate, while we're stuck voting for a party, and hoping that the leader of the party is someone we actually like. (And we have no actual power in deciding who the leader of a party is, that is entirely controlled by party members :/)
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1194 on: November 18, 2010, 12:55:43 PM »
That is.... wow.... 28 seats for the green party? lol.

But yeah, that is pretty fucked. Pretty much backwards from what things usually look like. Aside from the green party failing miserably, like they always do.
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Kulli

  • Guest
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1195 on: November 18, 2010, 04:42:25 PM »
I found the fact that the Bloc is the official opposition to be the funniest part personally

There are just so many weird things that would have to happen irl in order for that to happen (Hey Alberta: Have you voted BQ lately?) that it makes the surreal part of my brain happy.

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1196 on: November 18, 2010, 06:02:55 PM »
Good point, lol. I've always basically felt like the Bloc were a joke (albeit not a very funny one).
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Kulli

  • Guest
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1197 on: November 19, 2010, 11:16:30 PM »
hey fgts

As some of you may have noticed, I've been getting into making gifs lately. However, I can't seem to figure out how to make gifs with text like this, with the 1-2-3 style of appearing text. Any help kthx

K-Mann

  • Guest
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1198 on: November 19, 2010, 11:37:30 PM »
gifs are usually multiple frames aren't they? You should be able to just copy paste the text on to every frame you want it to be on, adding other text to other frames as needed. I could be wrong though, but when I open a gif up, all the frames become availible.

ALSO

RIP Pat Burns. Man, that name makes me nostalgia alot.

Spectere

  • \m/ (-_-) \m/
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5716
  • printf("%s\n", "Hi!");
    • View Profile
    • spectere.net
Re: THE MOST LAMEST THREAD OF 2010
« Reply #1199 on: November 20, 2010, 10:47:36 AM »
gifs are usually multiple frames aren't they? You should be able to just copy paste the text on to every frame you want it to be on, adding other text to other frames as needed.

Basically this.

GIFs are also limited to a 256 color palette shared amongst all frames, so make sure to use as few colors for the text as possible (or colors that are already being used by the actual image) so that quality is preserved as best as possible.
"This is a machine for making cows."