spectere.net

Retired => Retired Boards => Media => Topic started by: Zakamiro on July 26, 2008, 05:51:15 PM

Title: The Dark Knight
Post by: Zakamiro on July 26, 2008, 05:51:15 PM: You know it's that time.

I found it a good movie, except for:

SPOILERS

1) brucie went to hong kong, in the name of Gotham. Kwhat.
2) batman's voice in comparison to brucie's. (you can do it, brucie! [and holy shit, he at the whole chocolate cake, even with cookie's sweat and blood])
3) the change of the origin of two face (gasoline, not acid bath)
4) how gasoline/oil managed to do that much damage to his face. (gasoline evaporates quickly, could have been smothered out) Really, if your face has gasoline on it and catches fire, I highly doubt you'll be losing your cheek.
5) The cell phone sonar thing. I really don't think my phone's firmware can be easily hacked to allow for sonar, let alone create an entire 3D live map of gotham.
6) the lack of clarity given when the joker had switched the locations of rachel and harvey he told batman. They had gone to pick up rachel, but instead found harvey. Part of joker's scheming, etc.

Heath ledger's acting was in-fucking-credible though. yeaaaaaaaaaaa boiiiiiiiiii
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Bobbias on July 27, 2008, 12:22:56 AM: I didn't have much of a problem with those spoiled bits.

And yes, Heath Ledger's acting was unbelievable.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Alice on July 27, 2008, 12:43:56 PM: Heath Ledger kicked total ass. Didn't have much of a problem with 1-4, 5 seemed a bit fishy but wasn't too bad, and I had a bit of trouble understanding what was going on with 6, because some faggot was fucking around with candy wrappers while the Joker was talking. Stupid fucking camrip. I'm going to go see it for real some time, so I can actually focus on the movey.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Bobbias on July 27, 2008, 12:46:17 PM: Ugh, I could never watch a camrip. Telecine copies aren't so bad though.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Ridge on July 27, 2008, 01:07:37 PM: i have to tell you guys something

WATCH IT IN THE THEATERS!!!!!

the movie is more enjoyable with the fucking awesome sound effects

the acting was incredible, except for Maggie Gyllenhaal, she sucked imo
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Alice on July 27, 2008, 01:18:14 PM: pretty much beats the scientologist bitch in batman begins, though
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Ridge on July 27, 2008, 01:38:21 PM: Quote from: Kazuo on July 27, 2008, 01:18:14 PM
pretty much beats the scientologist bitch in batman begins, though

KIRSTEN DUNST

oh god dont make me go on about how fucking of a terrible actor she is god damn
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: annon on July 27, 2008, 02:33:55 PM: Quote from: RIIIIIDGE RACEEEEER on July 27, 2008, 01:38:21 PM
KIRSTEN DUNST

Katie Holmes?
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Ridge on July 27, 2008, 08:06:35 PM: oops i got spiderman and batman confused :-[
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: annon on July 27, 2008, 10:12:57 PM: Quote from: RIIIIIDGE RACEEEEER on July 27, 2008, 08:06:35 PM
oops i got spiderman and batman confused :-[

FOR SHAME
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: OmegaOmni on July 28, 2008, 02:45:04 AM: The Batmobile in the movie actually exists...it is not a prop of just something that exists for movie purposes.

Heath Ledger=fucking awesome Joker!
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Bobbias on July 28, 2008, 03:00:49 AM: Wicked, that thing is totally badass. Way more badass than the oldschool one.

And yes, Heath Ledger does make an absolutely amazing Joker.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Zakamiro on July 28, 2008, 05:05:46 AM: Quote from: Bobbias on July 28, 2008, 03:00:49 AM
Wicked, that thing is totally badass. Way more badass than the oldschool one.

if youre talking about the old batmobile in relation to the new one, fuck you.

The old one was WAAAAY cooler. Then again, the newer one is STILL pretty freaking awesome.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Bobbias on July 28, 2008, 07:54:30 AM: The old one was just like "look at me, I'm aerodynamic, and have a rocket on the back", the new one is like "I'm a fucking tank with a rocket on the back. I bust through walls, and fucking run you over."
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: cristian989 on July 28, 2008, 07:30:44 PM: Quote from: Zakamiro on July 28, 2008, 05:05:46 AM
if youre talking about the old batmobile in relation to the new one, fuck you.

The old one was WAAAAY cooler. Then again, the newer one is STILL pretty freaking awesome.

Oh yeah, well the "older" one is 100000x cooler

(http://images.wikia.com/marvel_dc/images/a/a7/Batman_1966_movie.JPG)
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Spectere on July 28, 2008, 09:12:02 PM: Three words: Adam Fucking West.

Yes.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: OmegaOmni on July 29, 2008, 01:24:23 AM: Quote from: Zakamiro on July 28, 2008, 05:05:46 AM
if youre talking about the old batmobile in relation to the new one, fuck you.

The old one was WAAAAY cooler. Then again, the newer one is STILL pretty freaking awesome.

Which one? The one from the first Batman movie with Nickolson as the Joker?
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: Alice on July 29, 2008, 02:56:05 AM: A BAT CREDIT CARD?

Also, lol bat eyebrows
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: TimJing on August 10, 2008, 10:24:27 PM: Yeah, I saw this the other day... the part where Rachel and the dude get kidnapped TOTALLY threw me the hell off. I guess I must've been nibbling my girlfriend's ear for a whole 3 seconds when I missed that =/
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: flaffl on September 10, 2008, 04:19:41 PM: &feature=related
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: MooMan1 on September 15, 2008, 02:46:58 PM: http://www.ubercharged.net/2008/09/14/the-dark-knight-told-in-tf2-death-signs/

The Dark Knight... as told by TF2 death signs.
Title: Re: The Dark Knight
Post by: cristian989 on September 28, 2008, 02:39:52 AM: Quote from: Spectere on July 28, 2008, 09:12:02 PM
Three words: Adam Fucking West.

Yes.

Shark Repellent Bat Spray

(http://thomaswood.blogsome.com/images/shark.JPG)