Author Topic: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004  (Read 498609 times)

Jupi

  • Striped Member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1334
  • ...omg...it spins...
    • View Profile
    • Jupi's website.  No, rly.
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #720 on: November 15, 2009, 12:13:52 PM »
Is it the kind of bad that makes it worth renting some months from now and laughing at it from your couch?

Or is it "shit your pants" bad?
actually fuck you guys just kidding keep my quote in your sigs

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • the pinnacle of human emotion
    • View Profile
    • DigitalMZX
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #721 on: November 15, 2009, 12:30:18 PM »
Just watched 2012. Bad bad movie.
Are you surprised?  Roland Emmerich has been making the same shitty movie over and over since 1995, except in 1995, it wasn't completely shitty. (also, I liked Stargate too)

Sqthreer!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
  • It's hip to be sq3r.
    • View Profile
    • Sqthreer.com
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #722 on: November 15, 2009, 03:14:12 PM »
It sure it gonna be exciting when the world ends in 2012 :D
"Floors are a lot like walls."
 - Alexxx

annon

  • AWSUM MODERATAR!!!!1
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #723 on: November 15, 2009, 03:37:05 PM »
The science is actually worse than in The Day After Tomorrow, and I would excuse that if the characters and story were any good. But they weren't. The characters were 2-dimensional and the drama was stolen from much better movies. I mean, where have you seen this before: Main character is a dad who has joint custody over his 2 kids, a girl and a boy. The girl is fine with him, but the boy doesn't like him too much, which you can tell because the boy calls him by his first name instead of "dad". Their mom is dating a plastic surgeon who is a huge tool. And these are the people we're with throughout the whole movie.

The disaster is that the earth's core is destabilized and is shifting and breaking apart because a solar flare caused an influx of neutrinos which caused the formation of a new subatomic particle which somehow heated the earth's lower layers. The more you know about neutrinos, the less sense that makes.

The worst part is that they try to spend the entire second act developing the characters, but anyone who paid to see this movie was only seeing it because of all the destruction shown in the trailers. It also only shows how flat the characters really are.

I expected the movie to be bad. I didn't expect it to be a manifestation of every disaster movie clich
« Last Edit: November 15, 2009, 03:40:39 PM by annon »

Code: [Select]
f(u,c,k,_,y,e,a,h)
{return u*u*u*u-u*u*u*_+u*u*y-u*e+a?k?f(u+1,c,k-1,_,y,e,a,h):0:putchar(u-c+h)==f(u+1,u,k-1,_,y,e,a,h);}
main(){return f(0,0,34,84,2423,26628,72864,98)<putchar(32)>f(0,0,40,125,5809,118995,906750,96)==~putchar(10);}

OmegaOmni

  • Bernard Deathrage Advocate
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1560
  • I am here to fuck the scout's mother.
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #724 on: November 15, 2009, 03:57:02 PM »
The science is actually worse than in The Day After Tomorrow, and I would excuse that if the characters and story were any good. But they weren't. The characters were 2-dimensional and the drama was stolen from much better movies. I mean, where have you seen this before: Main character is a dad who has joint custody over his 2 kids, a girl and a boy. The girl is fine with him, but the boy doesn't like him too much, which you can tell because the boy calls him by his first name instead of "dad". Their mom is dating a plastic surgeon who is a huge tool. And these are the people we're with throughout the whole movie.

The disaster is that the earth's core is destabilized and is shifting and breaking apart because a solar flare caused an influx of neutrinos which caused the formation of a new subatomic particle which somehow heated the earth's lower layers. The more you know about neutrinos, the less sense that makes.

The worst part is that they try to spend the entire second act developing the characters, but anyone who paid to see this movie was only seeing it because of all the destruction shown in the trailers. It also only shows how flat the characters really are.

I expected the movie to be bad. I didn't expect it to be a manifestation of every disaster movie clich

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • the pinnacle of human emotion
    • View Profile
    • DigitalMZX
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #725 on: November 15, 2009, 07:10:13 PM »
The disaster is that the earth's core is destabilized and is shifting and breaking apart because a solar flare caused an influx of neutrinos which caused the formation of a new subatomic particle which somehow heated the earth's lower layers.
* Alice has an aneurysm from stupidity

edit:
Okay, first, how the fuck would the Mayans be able to predict this (and if it had nothing to do with the Mayans, why is it called 2012)?  They didn't know shit about solar flares or neutrinos.
Second, NEUTRINOS DON'T WORK THAT WAY.  IF THEY DID, EARTH WOULD HAVE BLOWN UP BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO amirite
Third, "new subatomic particle"? :-\
« Last Edit: November 15, 2009, 07:15:52 PM by Alice »

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #726 on: November 15, 2009, 07:30:17 PM »
* Alice has an aneurysm from stupidity

edit:
Okay, first, how the fuck would the Mayans be able to predict this (and if it had nothing to do with the Mayans, why is it called 2012)?  They didn't know shit about solar flares or neutrinos.
Second, NEUTRINOS DON'T WORK THAT WAY.  IF THEY DID, EARTH WOULD HAVE BLOWN UP BILLIONS OF YEARS AGO amirite
Third, "new subatomic particle"? :-\

Well, the new subatomic particle thing is almost plausible, if you know much about quantum physics. Of course, the neutrino thing is just absolute bullshit.
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

Alice

  • B&!!!!1!!11`
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • the pinnacle of human emotion
    • View Profile
    • DigitalMZX
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #727 on: November 15, 2009, 09:13:20 PM »
Allow me to rephrase; Third, "new subatomic particle that makes Earth's core blow up but no other effects"? :-\

annon

  • AWSUM MODERATAR!!!!1
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #728 on: November 15, 2009, 09:24:07 PM »
Yep, no ill effects of any life on earth is reported prior to the major plate shifts.

Code: [Select]
f(u,c,k,_,y,e,a,h)
{return u*u*u*u-u*u*u*_+u*u*y-u*e+a?k?f(u+1,c,k-1,_,y,e,a,h):0:putchar(u-c+h)==f(u+1,u,k-1,_,y,e,a,h);}
main(){return f(0,0,34,84,2423,26628,72864,98)<putchar(32)>f(0,0,40,125,5809,118995,906750,96)==~putchar(10);}

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #729 on: November 15, 2009, 09:58:51 PM »
I said almost plausible. It's still stupid, but if we confined ourselves to known science without suspension of disbelief, we wouldn't have sci-fi. at all.
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x

annon

  • AWSUM MODERATAR!!!!1
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #730 on: November 15, 2009, 10:24:33 PM »
If it was good despite bad science, I would have enjoyed it. I mean, I enjoyed the Star Wars films, and they are terrible about space physics.

Code: [Select]
f(u,c,k,_,y,e,a,h)
{return u*u*u*u-u*u*u*_+u*u*y-u*e+a?k?f(u+1,c,k-1,_,y,e,a,h):0:putchar(u-c+h)==f(u+1,u,k-1,_,y,e,a,h);}
main(){return f(0,0,34,84,2423,26628,72864,98)<putchar(32)>f(0,0,40,125,5809,118995,906750,96)==~putchar(10);}

OmegaOmni

  • Bernard Deathrage Advocate
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1560
  • I am here to fuck the scout's mother.
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #731 on: November 15, 2009, 11:39:29 PM »
Because in space you die from aphixiation.

MortifiedocAlot

  • I GOT GULD STERRRRZZ
  • Hero Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4760
  • ಠ_ಠ
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #732 on: November 16, 2009, 01:35:17 AM »
Does anyone else remember the episode of Cowboy Bebop were spike puts two cotton balls in his ears, holds his breath, gets out of his ship while in space (I'm fairly sure he was at least in space, or had no oxygen) and he fired his gun to get propulsion to the next ship?



annon

  • AWSUM MODERATAR!!!!1
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
    • View Profile
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #733 on: November 16, 2009, 02:06:11 AM »
Yes. But Spike is cool, so it's ok.

Code: [Select]
f(u,c,k,_,y,e,a,h)
{return u*u*u*u-u*u*u*_+u*u*y-u*e+a?k?f(u+1,c,k-1,_,y,e,a,h):0:putchar(u-c+h)==f(u+1,u,k-1,_,y,e,a,h);}
main(){return f(0,0,34,84,2423,26628,72864,98)<putchar(32)>f(0,0,40,125,5809,118995,906750,96)==~putchar(10);}

Bobbias

  • #1 Poster
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7210
  • 404 Avatar not found.
    • View Profile
    • Magnetic Architect
Re: PRODUCING POSTS OF LAMENESS SINCE 2004
« Reply #734 on: November 16, 2009, 02:13:34 AM »
Well, the gun-firing-for-propulsion thing would still work.... Though I'd definitely like to see what actually happens if someone were to enter the near-perfect vacuum of space without a space suit to protect them...
This is going in my sig. :)

BANNED FOR BAD PUNS X_x